While Amber Rudd tinkers at the edges…


Universal Credit has been in the news a lot this week. Amber Rudd made a big deal about changing very little; and four loan mothers, supported by CPAG, won their case against the DWP in the High Court. As the minister was claiming how UC was both simpler and fairer, the court found that the rigid, automated application of the rules calculating monthly payments could result in situations that were not only unfair, but also counter to the original regulations.  There are all sorts of other situations where the accident of when the assessment period falls can result in a minefield.

Meanwhile, all sorts of errors continue to be common, as this week’s cases demonstrate.

One of our activists had received half her ESA payment early. When she contacted the DWP she was informed that this was a glitch in the system that had affected a lot of people and she would get the rest of the payment on the expected day. To the DWP, such a glitch may seem nothing to worry about, but when you are budgeting on a very low income, something like this can catch you out badly. The Mirror published a collection of worried reactions, including from people who hadn’t realised what was happening until the money was spent, leaving them short for the following month.

For John his payment seemed to be too late rather than too early. He is supposed to be being paid twice monthly, but we met him on the 9th, and according to his online journal, he wasn’t going to be paid any money until the 28th. In addition, he was also due a large back payment, as a bank error had meant that his benefit was initially paid to the wrong person. Although the money had been repaid, the DWP seemed in no hurry to transfer it to him.

Richard had waited in for a scheduled phone call from the jobcentre that never came, but the jobcentre refused to accept the error was theirs, so now he is being disciplined by having to come in every week, despite being unfit. He has just got the form to apply for a work capability assessment, and we suggested he get professional help from the Shelter drop-in.

Susan told us that she had been getting Universal Credit for some time, but when her partner also signed on and they moved to a joint claim, she found the payments were automatically transferred to his bank account. Payments for a couple are only made to one account, but you are supposed to be able to choose which. Susan has taken her case up with her MP.

For Jan, the problem was not an error, but a suggestion from her advisor that had left her shaking her head in bewilderment. She told us that her advisor hadn’t said anything about benefits, but had talked about magnetic fields and given her a leaflet about free Reiki sessions for helping with anxiety. I am sure the advisor was trying to be helpful, but this is a strange place to be promoting alternative therapy. Jan’s comment: Is she on drugs?

3 thoughts on “While Amber Rudd tinkers at the edges…

  1. I enjoyed the final para. When I am not being a benefits anorak, I dabble in various “alternative” stuff such as meditation and know lots of colourful characters who believe in all sorts of things that other folks might consider “weird” (e.g. that much of humanity’s problems require the magnetic poles to do a 180degree flip!) However, I have always kept these two strands of my life in separate “boxes”. It’s daft (and in some cases dangerous) for people like job centre staff to step outside their official roles esp. when dealing with folks who have mental health issues. Just being polite, considerate, compassionate, listening properly and applying the rules correctly according to the individual’s circumstances is what claimants need from DWP and local authority benefit decisions!


  2. PS. A more practical consideration is that if you are trying to convince DWP or a tribunal that you satisfy the conditions for ESA or PIP, you really want to use evidence from a recognised medical practitioner: e.g. your GP, hospital consultant, OT, physio, a counsellor with professional accreditation etc. I doubt if a letter from a reiki practitioner, spiritual guru etc would be taken seriously, even if the therapy is helpful to you. That’s why claimants for ESA, PIP etc should always be in regular contact with their GP etc even if he/she is unable to offer much in the way of helpful treatment. When I used to fill in ESA or PIP forms for claimants, my heart always sank when they replied that they had not seen their GP for the past 12 months etc (which could be the case if on repeat prescription etc).


Leave a Reply to dorsetiww Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s